So the Supreme Court handed down two news making decisions yesterday. First, they declared that mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders are unconstitutional. Frankly, I do not find this decision all that controversial. They didn't rule that a life sentence was unconstitutional (although I find life sentences for juveniles pretty barbaric) just the mandatory ones. What I find truly distressing is that four of the justices (and we all know which four) think locking up teenagers forever, regardless of age or circumstances, to be a good thing. I do like that the P-G quoted Allegheny County Common Pleas judge David Cashman:
"I've never liked mandatory sentences because I don't think a mandatory sentence applies to all the parties," he said. "People are unique."
The second newsworthy decision was the Court gutting Arizona's "Papers Please" law. Wingnuts like Arizona Governor Jan Brewer are trying to turn lemons into lemonade by noting that the court upheld the provision allowing police to ask people they reasonably suspect to be in the country illegally their immigration status. What everyone fails to note is that the police have ALWAYS been allowed to check the status of those they believe to be in the country illegally. Being in the country illegally is not a criminal offense, it is a civil offense, and Arizona had no right to criminalize it. Typically, Fat Tony Scalia had a meltdown over the majority's ruling. Apparently, states are "sovereign" when they do what Fat Tony wants, but, as in Montana's challenge to Citizens United, they're not when trying to do something he's opposed to.
Meanwhile, as the Court gets ready to issue its ruling on the Affordable Care Act, polling shows that majorities of Republicans and Independents like what's in the act, with the exception of President Obama's role in getting it passed.